About VP Capital

Our mission for positive impact is deeply rooted in our history. Explore how our current strategy and sustainability efforts have grown from this legacy.

Team

The strength of our company hinges on its team. They are the people propelling our mission to foster a more sustainable planet and society.

Philanthropy

Find out how we unlock the transformative potential of charity, through a multifaceted donation strategy.

Our background

Our roots date back more than 150 years. Discover our journey from family business to family office.
Biodiversity dependency: understanding nature-related risks in investment portfolios

Biodiversity dependency: understanding nature-related risks in investment portfolios

Biodiversity is increasingly recognised as relevant to investors, not only because economic activities affect nature, but also because many business models depend on it. When ecosystems degrade, the services they provide – such as raw materials, stable soils, or climate regulation – can no longer be taken for granted, creating operational and financial risks.

The concept of dependency is well established in climate finance: physical climate risks, transition risks, and exposure to climate systems are widely discussed and increasingly measured. By contrast, biodiversity dependency is a relatively new and emerging field. Although methodologies are evolving, there is growing recognition – reflected in initiatives like the Taskforce on Nature-related Financial Disclosures (TNFD) – that understanding how investments rely on nature is essential for long-term resilience.

At VP Capital, biodiversity is one of the three pillars of our impact-first strategy, alongside climate and social equality. To deepen our understanding of the nature-related risks in our portfolio, we conducted a biodiversity dependency assessment, focusing on how our investments depend on ecosystem services, both directly and through their value chains.

butterfly

What is biodiversity dependency?

Biodiversity dependency describes the extent to which economic activities rely on ecosystem services – the benefits that nature provides to society and the economy. These include:

  • Provisioning services, such as water, fibres, crops, and other biological raw materials.

  • Regulating services, such as climate regulation, erosion control, water purification, and flood mitigation.

  • Cultural services, including recreation, landscape quality, and contributions to human wellbeing and social value, both in natural and human-shaped environments.

Some dependencies are direct and physical, for example in agriculture or forestry. Other dependencies are indirect, embedded upstream or downstream in value chains. This makes them less visible, but no less relevant from a risk perspective.

biodiversity-as-a-living-infrastructure-1

Our approach: assessing dependency across the portfolio

VP Capital assessed biodiversity dependency using the ENCORE database, a widely used tool that links economic activities to ecosystem services and assesses dependency strength on a qualitative scale from very low to very high. The approach is aligned with emerging TNFD and CSRD thinking.

The assessment addresses three core questions:

  1. How dependent are the activities in our portfolio on ecosystem services?

  2. Where does dependency concentrate once portfolio allocation is taken into account?

  3. How can these insights inform engagement and future investment decisions?

The results provide insights at portfolio- and sector-level rather than site-specific measurements. While this does not capture all nuances, it provides a structured starting point for identifying exposure and vulnerability to nature-related risks.

Understanding intrinsic dependency across the portfolio

Figure 1 shows the average unweighted dependency score across sectors. This view highlights the intrinsic reliance on ecosystem services, independent of how much capital is invested in each sector.

The portfolio’s overall average dependency score is 26 out of 125, indicating a relatively low direct dependency at aggregate level. However, this masks meaningful differences between sectors.

  • Agriculture, forestry, and fishing show high to very high dependency across most ecosystem services, reflecting their strong reliance on natural systems.

  • Sectors such as accommodation, food services, education, arts, and health show elevated dependency, largely driven by cultural ecosystem services.

  • Manufacturing, construction, utilities, and professional services rely on natural resource inputs for their operational processes, even where dependency is less visible or indirect.

This unweighted view helps distinguish structural dependency from portfolio exposure.

ecosystem-dependency-score_pagina_4

When dependency scores are weighted by invested capital, a different picture emerges.

Manufacturing shows the highest overall weighted dependency score, reflecting both the nature of its activities and its relative weight in the portfolio. This illustrates how exposure to ecosystem service disruption can concentrate in sectors not always perceived as nature dependent.

Information and communication activities also show a notable weighted dependency, driven by indirect dependencies embedded in infrastructure, energy use, and supply chains, combined with portfolio allocation.

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing retain high dependency intensity, although their weighted score is moderated by their share of invested capital.

Real estate shows a more moderate direct dependency at portfolio level. At the same time, upstream activities, such as material production and land-use-related processes, remain important sources of ecosystem service dependence.

Figure 2: VP Capital portfolio – weighted direct biodiversity dependency by sector
Figure 2: VP Capital portfolio – weighted direct biodiversity dependency by sector

Why this matters for investment strategy

Understanding biodiversity dependency helps translate nature-related risks into investment-relevant insights. For VP Capital, this assessment provides a clearer view of where ecosystem degradation could affect business continuity, cost structures, or long-term value creation.

These insights will be used to:

  • Engage more intentionally with portfolio companies on nature-related risks and dependencies.

  • Raise awareness of less visible dependencies across value chains.

  • Inform future investment decisions by integrating nature-related considerations more structurally into our analysis.

Rather than aiming for perfect measurement, this work strengthens our ability to ask the right questions and to embed biodiversity considerations into long-term, responsible investment practices.

An evolving discipline

Biodiversity dependency assessment is still developing. Data availability, methodologies, and standards will continue to evolve, as they have in climate-related risk assessment over the past decade.

We see this assessment as a learning step – one that deepens our understanding of how nature underpins economic activity and supports more resilient investment decisions over time. Recognising dependency on ecosystem services is not about avoiding exposure but about investing with a clearer understanding of the natural systems that support long-term value.

Biodiversity dependency: understanding nature-related risks in investment portfolios

Related insights