A two-track approach to impact measurement
Our methodology recognises that not all impact is the same. We measure both the reduction of negative impacts (mitigation) and the creation of positive outcomes (solutions).
1. Mitigating negative impact: BCS themes
We use maturity assessments to evaluate how fund managers and direct companies address biodiversity, climate, and social equality (BCS) at the organisational level.
Each theme is scored across four dimensions:
Insight and mitigation of direct negative impacts (inside-out)
Identification and management of value chain risks (outside-in)
Engagement with portfolio companies (for fund managers)
Internal governance and policy
The result is a qualitative profile of each manager’s approach, providing insight into where they stand—and where there’s room to grow.
2. Contributing to solutions: Impact KPIs
At the underlying investment level, we assess how individual companies contribute to our six solutions. The process is twofold:
First, we make a binary classification: does the company align with a solution?
Second, if applicable, we ask our investment managers to gather quantitative impact data using 11 pre-defined KPIs, including:
CO2 avoided (net-zero)
Reduction in harmful substances (toxicity-free)
Volume of materials reused (circular)
Increase in biodiversity (regenerative)
The investment managers can also add a custom impact metric that is relevant to their specific business, ensuring the approach remains tailored and meaningful.
Our goal is to gain a deeper understanding of the actual quantitative impact realised by these solutions and to amplify impact narratives throughout our portfolio.