How our capital generates impact

Capital Impact

Impact in our screening process
Measuring the impact of our capital
Results of our portfolio
Portfolio Report
Contribution to solutions
Modest overall BCS results
The results per asset class
Direct participations
Real estate
Funds
Ventures
Listed equity
Chapter select
Impact in our screening process
Measuring the impact of our capital
Results of our portfolio
Portfolio Report
Contribution to solutions
Modest overall BCS results
The results per asset class
Direct participations
Real estate
Funds
Ventures
Listed equity

Impact in our screening process

Since implementing our previous strategy in 2018, impact has always been one of the factors guiding our investment decisions. Jeroen Heine, Director Investments: ‘Today, it is fully embedded in our entire investment process and governance, starting from the initial screening.’

Initial contact with an organisation is made by one of our Investment Managers, who conducts a preliminary assessment. One of our impact experts then evaluates whether the company or fund aligns with our six solutions and assesses the expected scale of its impact.

Jeroen Heine

Risk, Return, and Impact Rating

Once the initial screening is completed, we move into an in-depth due diligence phase. ‘This stage involves the formation of a deal team, comprising the Investment Manager, an Impact Manager, a finance team member, and a legal team member. Together, they evaluate both the impact and the financial viability and scalability of the potential investment.’ ‘All findings are consolidated into a Risk, Return, and Impact (RRI) rating, which provides a clear overview of impact and financial and risk considerations. This rating ensures an objective decision-making process and allows for comparisons between different projects. Notably, the impact component of the RRI holds greater weight than the financial aspect,’ Jeroen Heine explains.

New impact investment focus

As part of our updated strategy, we have altered our screening process to place more emphasis on impact funds and early-stage investments:

  1. Investment funds: We apply strict sustainability criteria to all new investment funds, favouring Article 9 funds under the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR) or funds with a comparable designation. These are recognised as sustainable investments. In addition, we require new funds to be aligned with our defined solutions for at least 80%. In 2024, 42% of our impact funds were classified as Article 9 and 33% as Article 8 funds. 22% of non-impact funds were classified as Article 8 funds.

  2. Early-stage investments: To maximise our impact, we aim to support early-stage investments, particularly pre-seed, seed-stage and Series A companies. By supporting start-ups in these critical phases, we help drive significant change in our focus areas. Eligible companies must operate within one of our solutions and be headquartered in Belgium or the Netherlands. As our organisation grows, we aim to further expand our geographical reach.

What about divestment?

Our aim is to build reliable, long-term partnerships with the companies we invest in. We don’t impose rigid timelines, allowing our partners to focus on sustainable growth rather than short-term returns. Systemic change, climate transition, and tackling root causes all take time – and we are committed to offering that time, along with our continued support.

While our goal is to build lasting partnerships, divestment may at times be necessary to meet strategic objectives. As part of our new strategy, we now embed impact and sustainability targets into exit agreements from the outset of each collaboration. By doing so, we hope to ensure that, should VP Capital or any other party exit, the investment will continue to advance along its sustainability roadmap, delivering lasting, positive outcomes for all parties involved.

Measuring the impact of our capital

Our engagement tool

In line with our new strategy, we developed a new tailored engagement tool to strengthen the dialogue with our portfolio and better align capital deployment with our targets. We co-created this tool with the consultancy firm Holtara.

In a first step, we asked all our investments – across all asset classes – to provide key information. Jobien Laurijssen, Impact Manager: ‘We want to understand the impact journey of our investments and learn from each other’s experiences. To foster greater engagement and ensure that we would collect high-quality, relevant data, we hosted webinars to present our new strategy and clarify expectations.’

What did we measure? 

The methodology was based on two principles:

  • Managing risks and reducing negative impacts

  • Creating positive impacts

For each investment, we examined the level of maturity of biodiversity, climate, and social equality (BCS), meaning to what extent investments had determined their negative impacts and risks and had developed policies to manage and mitigate these.

Furthermore, we analysed how much of our capital is actively contributing to one or more of our six solutions. By 2028, 80% of our capital (excluding direct participations) must be invested in those solutions. For each solution, we’ve also created specific KPIs. Jobien Laurijssen explains: ‘Measuring these is still a work in progress, we are engaging with our investments to understand which impact metrics they are already tracking, what we can learn from their approaches, and how we can jointly enhance positive impact. ’

For direct participations, we tracked how much progress they’ve made on their impact roadmap and discussed where we can support them.

Structured engagement

Once we had analysed the data, we provided each investment with an in-depth analysis of their efforts. The aim was to have meaningful conversations with our portfolio about maximising impact. We discussed best practices, potential risks, and areas for improvement in governance structure. We also explored how they could strengthen their positive impact by implementing strategies aligned with international frameworks.

We wanted to deepen our engagement, exchange best practices, inspire each other and see where we – as VP Capital - can support or add value, while jointly bringing the impact field further.

To determine an investment's maturity level, we checked the following sub-categories:

1. Biodiversity maturity scales

  • Biodiversity impacts: insights into the negative effects of operations, supply chains, and products on ecosystems and natural resources, as well as the targets and action plans to reduce them.

  • Nature risks: insights into environmental risks businesses face due to biodiversity loss, climate change, and resource depletion, and the strategies in place to mitigate them.

  • Governance: policies and frameworks to manage and reduce ecosystem impacts.

  • Engagement: applicable only to funds. Assesses the fund manager’s efforts to engage with underlying investments on biodiversity.

  • Biodiversity impacts: insights into the negative effects of operations, supply chains, and products on ecosystems and natural resources, as well as the targets and action plans to reduce them.

  • Nature risks: insights into environmental risks businesses face due to biodiversity loss, climate change, and resource depletion, and the strategies in place to mitigate them.

  • Governance: policies and frameworks to manage and reduce ecosystem impacts.

  • Engagement: applicable only to funds. Assesses the fund manager’s efforts to engage with underlying investments on biodiversity.

2. Climate maturity scales

  • Carbon footprint: measurement of emissions, target setting for reductions, and decarbonisation across operations and the value chain.

  • Climate risks: identification and mitigation of risks linked to extreme weather, rising temperatures, and regulatory changes.

  • Governance: policies and frameworks to manage and reduce climate impacts.

  • Engagement: applicable only to funds. Assesses the fund manager’s efforts to engage with underlying companies on climate impact and to integrate climate-related risks into their overall strategy.

  • Carbon footprint: measurement of emissions, target setting for reductions, and decarbonisation across operations and the value chain.

  • Climate risks: identification and mitigation of risks linked to extreme weather, rising temperatures, and regulatory changes.

  • Governance: policies and frameworks to manage and reduce climate impacts.

  • Engagement: applicable only to funds. Assesses the fund manager’s efforts to engage with underlying companies on climate impact and to integrate climate-related risks into their overall strategy.

3. Social equality maturity scales

  • Employee well-being: promotion of health, work-life balance, fair pay, and a supportive work environment to ensure long-term productivity.

  • Value chain: promotion of ethical and sustainable practices across supply chains, including fair labour, human rights, and community impact.

  • Governance: policies and frameworks to manage and mitigate social risks, including those related to labour rights.

  • Engagement: steps taken by the fund manager to engage with underlying companies to address social impact and to integrate risks into their overall strategy.

  • Employee well-being: promotion of health, work-life balance, fair pay, and a supportive work environment to ensure long-term productivity.

  • Value chain: promotion of ethical and sustainable practices across supply chains, including fair labour, human rights, and community impact.

  • Governance: policies and frameworks to manage and mitigate social risks, including those related to labour rights.

  • Engagement: steps taken by the fund manager to engage with underlying companies to address social impact and to integrate risks into their overall strategy.

bcs

Maturity level of biodiversity, climate, and social equality

We analysed the impacts, risks, governance, and engagement of each investment, and the results are scaled in a maturity level:

  • Level 1 was assigned when there is little or no insight into impacts, risks, or governance practices.

  • Level 5 was awarded to those investments that assessed their impacts and risks thoroughly, developed robust governance and focused on year-on-year progress driven by action plans.

Results of our portfolio

We invest our capital across a variety of asset classes, with our long-standing direct participations representing the majority

portfolio-results

Our portfolio has continued to expand and diversify. Our portfolio is primarily concentrated in the Netherlands and Belgium, though our reach is global.

In 2024, we were invested in:

  • 8 Direct Participations

  • 7 Real Estate funds plus our own VP Real Estate (VP Vastgoed) as well as direct Real Estate investments

  • 10 Ventures

  • 3 Listed Equities

  • 40 Funds of which 28 impact funds and 12 non-impact funds

We made 13 new investments in 2024 across 3 asset classes. Each of these investments was impact-focused, contributing to one or more of our 6 solutions. 

investeringen

Contribution to solutions

Excluding our direct participations, 54% of the remaining capital is now invested in organisations that directly contribute to one or more of our solutions. This corresponds to 365 (direct and indirect) investments – a significant step towards our goal of aligning 80% of our capital with solutions by 2028.

waterval

Jobien Laurijssen, Impact Manager: ‘The largest contributions came from the inclusive and net-zero solutions, driven by societal real estate (e.g. HCRE, Senectute, and Franklin Templeton) and impact funds with a climate focus. These accounted for 20% and 15% of our capital, respectively.’

All three holdings in the listed equity asset class (Accys Technologies, Aquaporin and Avantium) are solution-aligned, contributing specifically to the 'bio-based' and 'toxicity-free' categories.

Harvesting jackfruit in Uganda
Harvesting jackfruit in Uganda (Fiber Foods)

‘Investments not yet aligned with a specific solution were largely made before we adopted our impact-first strategy, though many still address relevant issues such as healthcare.’

Quantifying impact per solution

Before we describe the 2024 impact per solution, it is important to highlight that the impact we present reflects the impact created by the portfolio investments, not by VP Capital itself. VP Capital only holds a small percentage share in these funds, and the credits for the impact rightly belong to them. We rely on data reported by our investments, which are assessed by Holtara.

social-equality-1705052573

Inclusive

Out of 761 (direct and indirect) investments, 133 contributed to the inclusive solution – primarily through investments in societal real estate and companies in social impact funds. Several assets (e.g. Triginta, Fiber Foods, SI3, Goodwell and more) reported on VP Capital’s ‘lives improved’ impact metric, together reaching a total of 782,000 people in 2024. Other reported metrics included the number of social housing units in the Homes4All portfolio (monitored by Phitrust) and Social Return on Investment (SROI) ratios from companies in the SI3 Fund.

istock-1450272068

Net-zero

31 investments contributed to the net-zero solution. A significant share of the impact was driven by climate-focused funds such as World Fund I, Princeville CT I, Shift Invest III, and SET Ventures III and IV. Across the portfolio, assets reported 17,021 ktCO₂e of avoided emissions and 462 ktCO₂e in carbon removals. For example, Accsys Technologies (known for its durable, sustainable wood for high-performance construction) tracks the amount of carbon sequestered in its products sold.

biobased

Bio-based

12 companies show a clear link to this bio-based solution. Impact measurement for this solution is still developing. As of now, the HAVEP building is the only asset reporting quantitatively, with 898 tonnes of non-renewable resources replaced. Other examples of bio-based solutions include:

  • Zymofix, which offers biomass fermentation technologies for agriculture.

  • FULFoods (Shift Invest), which develops algae-based ingredients as renewable alternatives to conventional food inputs.

  • Avantium, which develops plant-based plastic.

toxicity-free

Toxicity-free

17 investments fall under the toxicity-free category. Three companies from the PYMWYMIC portfolio tracked this selected impact metric, reporting a total of 233 tonnes of toxic materials replaced. These companies are:

  • Ceradis, a developer of eco-friendly crop protection and plant nutrition solutions.

  • Naïo Technologies, a developer of agricultural robots.

  • Aurea Imaging, a provider of precision orchard management tools that help farmers monitor and reduce chemical inputs.

istock-1078856210

Circular

50 investments supported the circular solution, including Cyleb (Worldfund I), which recycles end-of-life batteries into critical raw materials. In 2024, two of the portfolio companies reported a total of 51,131 tonnes of virgin resource use avoided:

BYBORRE limits the use of virgin resources through on-demand, local production and the use of recycled and bio-based materials in fabric manufacturing.

Tazaar (Impact Shakers) promotes circularity by listing devices a Digital Product Passport platform, enabling electronics reuse and repair.

regenerative

Regenerative

We identified 38 assets in the regenerative solution. Notable drivers included Aquaspark, PYMWYMIC, and VP Landbouw. In total, 185k hectares of land/water were regenerated. Additionally, we also see adjacent metrics being reported, such as 43,890 m³ of freshwater saved, and 14,974 tonnes of sustainable (sea)food produced. A number of additional assets contributed to regenerative outcomes but have not yet been reported using standardised metrics.

Modest overall BCS results

bsc-scores

For each investment, we examined the maturity of biodiversity, climate, and social equality (BCS) challenges – meaning the extent to which investments had identified their negative impacts and risks, and had developed policies to manage these. 2024 was the first year we reported against this ambitious impact framework.

Jobien Laurijssen, Impact Manager: ‘The relatively modest initial results reflect the framework’s high standards and highlight the potential for greater impact. Two more technical factors also help explain these lower scores:

  1. Some funds or companies focus on a single theme, giving less attention to others, which affects the overall outcome.

  2. Our portfolio includes many early-stage companies, particularly within impact venture capital funds, that are primarily focused on developing and scaling their innovations. At this stage, setting formal policies or reduction targets is less common and typically becomes more relevant in later phases.’

Room for improvement in biodiversity

Biodiversity emerged as the least mature topic, with an average score of 1.6.

biodiversity-score

‘This result is not surprising, given that biodiversity is still underrepresented in many materiality assessments. Another explanation is the limited knowledge on the topic. Nevertheless, some frontrunners – such as VP Textile and PYMWYMIC – are already taking strong action and showing meaningful integration.’

Jobien Laurijssen, Impact Manager

Jobien Laurijssen

Engagement by funds with investees on biodiversity themes shows the greatest room for improvement, with an average score of 1.2. Impact funds, however, are better equipped than non-impact funds to initiate these conversations.

Biodiversity emerged as the least mature topic, with an average score of 1.6.

biodiversity-score

‘This result is not surprising, given that biodiversity is still underrepresented in many materiality assessments. Another explanation is the limited knowledge on the topic. Nevertheless, some frontrunners – such as VP Textile and PYMWYMIC – are already taking strong action and showing meaningful integration.’

Jobien Laurijssen, Impact Manager

Jobien Laurijssen

Engagement by funds with investees on biodiversity themes shows the greatest room for improvement, with an average score of 1.2. Impact funds, however, are better equipped than non-impact funds to initiate these conversations.

The most mature area: climate

climate-score

Climate is the most advanced theme, with an average score of 2.2. Carbon footprint measurement stands out with a score of 2.8, reflecting a broader market maturity. Governance averages 2.2, while climate risks assessment and engagement still lag behind. The biggest areas for improvement are in setting (net-zero) targets and/or, for example, making an official commitment to the SBTi, demonstrably reducing GHG emissions year over year, and ultimately achieving the targets.

‘The main areas for improvement across our investments include setting (net-zero) targets and/or, for example, making an official commitment to the SBTi, demonstrably reducing GHG emissions year-on-year, and ultimately achieving the targets.’

Mark Schravesande, Impact manager

vp-capital_portretten_15mei_0325-lr
climate-score

Climate is the most advanced theme, with an average score of 2.2. Carbon footprint measurement stands out with a score of 2.8, reflecting a broader market maturity. Governance averages 2.2, while climate risks assessment and engagement still lag behind. The biggest areas for improvement are in setting (net-zero) targets and/or, for example, making an official commitment to the SBTi, demonstrably reducing GHG emissions year over year, and ultimately achieving the targets.

‘The main areas for improvement across our investments include setting (net-zero) targets and/or, for example, making an official commitment to the SBTi, demonstrably reducing GHG emissions year-on-year, and ultimately achieving the targets.’

Mark Schravesande, Impact manager

vp-capital_portretten_15mei_0325-lr

Positive signals on social equality

social-equality-score

Impact funds, listed equities, and direct participations show the highest maturity levels. Still, some impact funds with clear social missions underperformed.

Marije Rhebergen: ‘This can be explained by the fact that ventures and venture funds often have limited capacity, and therefore place less emphasis on formal standards and guidelines.’

‘While many organisations have internal DEI policies and employee well-being initiatives, fewer address social issues across their supply chains.’

Marije Rhebergen, Director Impact & Communication

vp-capital_portretten_15mei_0268-lr
social-equality-score

Impact funds, listed equities, and direct participations show the highest maturity levels. Still, some impact funds with clear social missions underperformed.

Marije Rhebergen: ‘This can be explained by the fact that ventures and venture funds often have limited capacity, and therefore place less emphasis on formal standards and guidelines.’

‘While many organisations have internal DEI policies and employee well-being initiatives, fewer address social issues across their supply chains.’

Marije Rhebergen, Director Impact & Communication

vp-capital_portretten_15mei_0268-lr

Lessons learned

The assessment provided valuable insights into the current state of our portfolio.

Jobien Laurijssen: ‘We’ve had meaningful conversations with our investees about the steps we could take together, and best practices that might serve as inspiration. Many shared that biodiversity, climate, and social equality are also key priorities for them. So we believe we’ve made real progress in raising awareness.’

Following this baseline year, we plan to refine our methodology based on feedback from our portfolio. Ventures and venture funds, in particular, indicated that the current framework does not fully reflect their reality.

‘We aim to adapt the tool to better suit this asset type – ensuring it remains both feasible and relevant, while still ambitious. We’ll also place greater emphasis on materiality and create space for each investment’s unique contribution and narrative. Additionally, we identified a clear need for shared learning and best practices exchange.’

To support this, VP Capital will host a best practice webinar and continue to offer support and knowledge sharing throughout the engagement cycle.

The results per asset class

Direct participations lead the way

With direct participations accounting for 59% of our Total Portfolio Value, driving sustainability improvements in this asset class is a top priority. We actively engage with and support these companies in developing and implementing impact roadmaps.

Each year, we identify concrete projects and initiatives that tackle global challenges through innovative solutions. We track progress by measuring the percentage of successfully completed roadmap goals and actions. Our goal is for portfolio companies to complete, on average, more than 80% of their impact roadmap projects each year by 2028.

In 2024, companies completed an average of 89% of their impact roadmap projects – well above the annual target of 80%.

‘This strong result is first and foremost a credit to the companies themselves. We are grateful to have been able to support them in developing realistic yet ambitious sustainability roadmaps and offering targeted help where possible. It shows what is possible when we move forward together – and reinforces our belief in the value of active ownership.’

- Jobien Laurijssen, Impact Manager

Jobien Laurijssen

Direct participations also perform better on the BCS maturity scale than other asset classes, with average scores of 1.5 for biodiversity, 2.4 for climate, and 2.1 for social equality.

Climate initiatives are particularly advanced. Carbon reduction efforts are more widespread than in other asset classes, and science-based targets (such as SBTi commitments) are commonly adopted. They have already taken many steps to make their carbon footprint transparent, implement reduction measures, and commit to international standards. Concrete actions - such as installing heat pumps and using low-carbon materials - are being implemented across the portfolio. To continue improving, we have naturally set the bar high. The next steps include implementing year-on-year actions toward net zero (scope 1 and 2), gaining deeper insight into climate risks, developing strategies to reduce and mitigate climate risk exposure (for example, through dual sourcing), and reporting on these efforts according to leading frameworks such as TCFD.

‘Companies address social equality primarily through employee-focused initiatives. However, the depth and reach of these initiatives vary. While current projects tend to focus less on value chain workers and the local community, VP Textile is actively working to improve supply chain labour conditions, in line with its Fair Wear Foundation membership.’

Biodiversity remains the area with the greatest potential for improvement, although important steps have already been taken.

‘VP Textile and VP Landbouw have both conducted biodiversity footprint assessments to map their environmental impact. Notably, VP Textile shows a strong grasp of biodiversity risks and mitigation projects. It is also actively working to eliminate the use of so-called “forever chemicals”.’

img_4597

VP Landbouw: advancing regenerative agriculture

In 2024, VP Landbouw continued its journey towards regenerative agriculture and ecosystem restoration. Techniques such as no-till farming, crop rotation, composting, and mixed cropping ...

Read more
training-india2

VP Textile: leading in circularity and social responsibility

In 2024, VP Textile – comprising HAVEP, Hydrowear, and Van Heurck – made significant strides across all sustainability pillars. The brands expanded their circular collections, launched social ...

Read more
cover-jaarverslag-plus-simulatie-elementen-v4

Batenburg Techniek: engineering sustainable progress

Batenburg Techniek’s most significant contribution to sustainability lies in the projects it delivers for clients – supporting their shift toward greener operations. The company focuses on smart solutions ...

Read more
mediahuisall

Mediahuis: building trustand accelerating sustainability

Through its group-wide IMPACT programme, Mediahuis is committed to trustworthy journalism, diverse talent development, and accelerating the green transition.

Read more
denbosch_designmuseum_highres-20

Q-lite: Pioneering innovation with purpose

Q-lite continues to raise its bar on sustainable innovation, offering advanced digital display solutions with a commitment to circularity, energy efficiency, and responsible business practices.

Read more

Building impact: Our real estate endeavours

The built environment plays a vital role in shaping a more sustainable and inclusive future. Mark Schravesande, Impact Manager, explains: ‘For us, real estate is not just an asset class – it is a key driver of positive change. In 2024, we took significant steps to further align our real estate portfolio with our impact-first strategy.’
By sharpening our investment criteria, focusing on sustainable construction, and embedding societal value in every project, we made tangible progress towards our long-term goals.
Through a combination of direct investments and fund participations, we achieved measurable reductions in emissions, increased the share of societal real estate in our portfolio, and strengthened our contribution to climate, biodiversity, and social equality.

While investing in affordable housing is urgently needed, it can paradoxically contribute to rising prices when investors (including us) set return expectations that are too high. At VP Capital, we recognise this challenge and are making a conscious effort to critically assess our own role. We aim to reflect on whether our current return requirements may still be higher than what is compatible with keeping housing truly affordable – and to explore how we can shift from being part of the problem to becoming part of the solution.

‘Real estate at VP Capital is not just an asset class – it can be a key lever for positive change.’

- Mark Schravesande

vp-capital_portretten_15mei_0496-lr
Our goals: Real Estate creating positive change

Since 2024, we have focused on investing in sustainable, energy-efficient buildings that contribute to a healthier and more inclusive living environment. Our ambition is bold yet necessary to realise a 70-80% intensity reduction in real estate CO2 emissions by 2030, in line with our validated science-based targets.

Achieving this requires a rigorous approach: while many countries, such as the Netherlands, already enforce sustainability standards through regulation, we go beyond sustainability regulations and invest only when there is a contribution to one of our six solutions. In line with this commitment, we aim to maximise the following in all new construction projects:

  • Net-zero ('zero on the meter'), achieving an energy label of at least A

  • Maximum use of circular and bio-based materials

  • Biodiversity and inclusiveness are integral elements of every project

Examples from our portfolio include:

  • Biobased: The headquarter of HAVEP was predominantly built with recyclable and renewable materials. As a result, HAVEP received an award for its circular design.

  • Circular: Triginta focuses on upgrading historic buildings, preserving their structures and preventing demolition waste.

  • Inclusive: HOF36 near Leiden offers 126 units of affordable housing, partnered with Holland Rijnland, to meet social housing needs.

  • Net-zero: Several of our investments, including REG, Franklin Templeton, and Triginta are improving building energy performance through solar panels and heat pump installations.

Prioritising societal real estate

In 2024, we decided to embed a clear societal purpose into our real estate strategy by ensuring that at least 50% of our real estate investments qualify as societal real estate.

Mark Schravesane explains: ‘This means that residential properties must actively contribute to affordable housing or target underserved groups, addressing urgent local housing needs. For corporate real estate, properties must support public functions such as education, healthcare, culture, or social welfare. Finally, we also aim to give historic buildings new societal functions.’ We believe these properties hold cultural and community value, and by thoughtfully repurposing them, we can contribute to social needs – whether through affordable housing, community spaces, or other public uses – while preserving their historic character. Triginta is a good example of this approach, where we are working to combine historic preservation with meaningful, socially relevant uses.

By integrating these principles into every investment decision, we aim to create spaces that offer stable financial returns and, at the same time, strengthen communities and generate long-term social value.

In 2024, we decided to embed a clear societal purpose into our real estate strategy by ensuring that at least 50% of our real estate investments qualify as societal real estate.

Mark Schravesane explains: ‘This means that residential properties must actively contribute to affordable housing or target underserved groups, addressing urgent local housing needs. For corporate real estate, properties must support public functions such as education, healthcare, culture, or social welfare. Finally, we also aim to give historic buildings new societal functions.’ We believe these properties hold cultural and community value, and by thoughtfully repurposing them, we can contribute to social needs – whether through affordable housing, community spaces, or other public uses – while preserving their historic character. Triginta is a good example of this approach, where we are working to combine historic preservation with meaningful, socially relevant uses.

By integrating these principles into every investment decision, we aim to create spaces that offer stable financial returns and, at the same time, strengthen communities and generate long-term social value.

Building resilience

Real estate today faces a growing array of risks, including climate risks such as floods and extreme heat, value risks from shifting market demands, and regulatory risks from tightening environmental laws. We proactively integrate these factors into investment due diligence and continually adapt our strategy to remain resilient.

In addition to our real estate investments, we are broadening our focus to encompass the wider built environment and related solutions. This includes exploring investments in property technologies (‘proptech’) that enable more sustainable management, use, and development of buildings, as well as placing greater emphasis on bio-based and circular solutions for the construction and maintenance of the built environment.

Real estate today faces a growing array of risks, including climate risks such as floods and extreme heat, value risks from shifting market demands, and regulatory risks from tightening environmental laws. We proactively integrate these factors into investment due diligence and continually adapt our strategy to remain resilient.

In addition to our real estate investments, we are broadening our focus to encompass the wider built environment and related solutions. This includes exploring investments in property technologies (‘proptech’) that enable more sustainable management, use, and development of buildings, as well as placing greater emphasis on bio-based and circular solutions for the construction and maintenance of the built environment.

Our results: Real estate in our solutions

Real estate investments represent 19% of our total portfolio. Within this asset class, 61% actively contributes to one of our six solutions. The strongest positive contribution lies in inclusivity, reflecting our renewed focus on societal real estate funds. Additionally, our real estate portfolio contributes to net-zero and bio-based solutions. Topics such as toxicity-free and regenerative solutions are generally less applicable in the real estate context.

While many investments demonstrate a clear social purpose, this is not yet strongly reflected in the mitigation of negative impacts with regards to broader social equality-related risks and governance aspects, regarding occupants' health or value chain risks, for example. In contrast, we observe more advancements in the areas of biodiversity and climate in the real estate portfolio.

The real estate sector is changing fast, driven by new regulations, rising sustainability demands and technological innovation. Looking forward, we see these shifts as opportunities to create a lasting impact. 

Triginta

Triginta is a real estate development company with a strong commitment to sustainability. The company operates a service-oriented business model: instead of selling properties, it leases them. By retaining ownership, it takes active responsibility for the long-term environmental performance of its portfolio.

Read more
Jasper Schokkaert (links) en Mark Schravesande (rechts)
Jasper Schokkaert (links) en Mark Schravesande (rechts)

Growing share of impact-focused funds

All new fund investments by VP Capital will be impact-focused. Mathijs van der Knaap, Investments Manager explains: ‘While we remain invested in existing non-strategic funds, these will be gradually phased out – resulting in a steadily growing share of impact investments within our fund portfolio.’

‘While we remain invested in existing non-strategic funds, these will be gradually phased out – resulting in a steadily growing share of impact investments within our fund portfolio.’

- Mathijs van der Knaap, Investments Manager

vp-capital_portretten_27mei_0302-lr
Our goals: alignment of fund portfolio companies

At least 80% of our fund portfolio companies are expected to align with one or more of the six key solutions that guide our investments and actions.

‘Currently, our fund portfolio is skewed towards venture funds,’ notes Mathijs. ‘In the coming years, we want to bring back balance by shifting our focus towards impact funds that invest in later-stage companies. In particular, we will be targeting strategies that focus on equity investments in profitable companies with clearly defined impact objectives. In parallel, we are gradually exploring new opportunities in emerging markets.’

We aim for future fund investments to comply with Article 9 of the EU Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR). In some cases, we may consider Article 8 or non-EU funds if these demonstrate a comparable level of ambition.

Our results: focus on climate technology

Impact funds, representing 10% of our total portfolio value, are the most mature in taking action to promote social equality. Biodiversity efforts, however, show the greatest need for further development. This conclusion is consistent with the results in other asset classes. In total, 64% of the funds contribute to one or more solutions. The majority focuses on climate technology, followed by inclusion.

Non-strategic funds, about 8% of our total portfolio value, show similar results, with climate and social equality themes being more of a focus, with biodiversity remaining underserved. Because these are non-strategic funds, only a limited number of the underlying investments contribute to one of VP Capital’s solutions (8.1% of portfolio value in this asset class).

160526_conciergerie-si.mathie_0256_hd

In 2024, VP Capital committed to eight new funds, all fully aligned with our updated impact strategy. Each reflects our ongoing focus on long-term value creation and positive societal and environmental outcomes:

  • SET Ventures IV targets innovation in carbon-free energy systems.

  • Princeville Climate Technology focuses on growth-stage climate tech companies.

  • CGV Fashion Fund I supports innovation that stimulates a sustainable fashion ecosystem.

  • Impact Shakers Ventures backs start-ups working on net-zero and inclusive solutions.

  • BigCircle Ventures is a venture builder creating climate and circularity-driven companies from unutilized IP of Universities and knowledge institutes.

  • Impact Expansion Fund I addresses a broad range of sustainability, inclusive and health challenges.

  • SI3 Fund invests in equal opportunities to foster an inclusive and equitable society.

  • Phitrust Partenaires Inclusion is focused on investing in companies that enable a more inclusive society where everyone can find their place and live with dignity.

enpal

Princeville Capital

Princeville Capital’s Climate Technology Fund I targets businesses developing innovative solutions in clean energy, carbon reduction, energy efficiency, and sustainable resource management.

Read more
alchimistes

Phitrust Partenaires Inclusion

In 2024, VP Capital committed to Phitrust Partenaires Inclusion, a fund in partnership with the European Investment Fund and classified under Article 9 of the SFDR.

Read more
florentine_shiftinvest_l

SHIFT Invest

SHIFT Invest is a venture capital fund dedicated exclusively to supporting innovative companies driving the transition to a more sustainable economy. Its investment focus spans energy transition, smart food and agriculture, green industries, and sustainable mobility logistics.

Read more

Our new asset class: ventures

As part of our new strategy, we are directly investing in early-stage ventures – impact-driven start-ups that develop innovative solutions for the three challenges we have prioritised.

Erica van Eeghen, Senior Manager Ventures at VP Capital: ‘We choose to invest directly in ventures because they need patient capital, which is something VP Capital is known for. Unlike funds that are structured to return capital within 10 to 12 years, we take a long-term shareholder approach. We also recognise that early-stage companies face challenges like product development and commercialisation, often requiring longer investment horizons.’

Erica van Eeghen: How can early-stage ventures help tackle the world’s biggest challenges?

Through active involvement, VP Capital seeks to support ventures in refining their business models, improving operations, and accelerating market penetration, ultimately enabling them to create long-term value and drive positive impact. ‘Going forward, we are exploring how to better leverage our network, better offering valuable connections to partners, investors, and key industry stakeholders where possible.’

Our goals: more investments in ventures

Over the next five years, our goal is to allocate 8% to maximum 10% of our assets to ventures.

Our results:  challenges in collecting data

Ventures, currently representing 3% of the total portfolio value, are the most mature intaking action to promote social equality. However, only 5 out of 10 ventures have been assessed on BCS, due to factors such as small scale, recent investment, and limited data availability. Existing maturity scales may not be fully suited to ventures, which often have low negative impacts, limited resources, and a strong focus on scaling their solutions. That is why, in 2025, we will explore how to either adapt the maturity scale to better reflect their context or draw on best practices from our portfolio to refine how we assess ventures and learn from them.

46% of the venture portfolio (by value) contributes to at least one of VP Capital’s solutions. Most of this contribution is directed towards the toxicity-free and circular solutions.

zymofix_yb21

Zymofix

Zymofix is a Belgian start-up pioneering the use of agricultural waste streams to make substrate, on which microorganisms are grown to create an alternative for traditional fertilisers, stimulants and pesticides. 

Read more
cutting_with_knive

Fiber Foods

Fiber Foods taps into the growing demand for plant-based, high-fibre food alternatives by transforming a dehydrated jackfruit ingredient into a variety of innovative, healthy food options. Up to 40% can be blended ...

Read more
photo-2024-10-02-16-37-05

Hypersoniq

Based in Delft, the start-up specialises in electrochemical sensor technology for the real-time monitoring of liquids.

Read more
hyet-solar

Hyet Solar

HyET Solar is committed to accelerating the transition to a sustainable energy future through its innovative, flexible, and circular solar modules. The company aims to make green energy both affordable and seamlessly...

Read more

Our ambition for listed equity

We aim to build a focused listed equity portfolio that contributes meaningfully to at least one of our six solution areas - and, through that, to our broader impact goals on biodiversity, climate, and social equality. By the end of 2028, we target allocating approximately 10% of our capital to this asset class, with a strict requirement that 100% of these investments align with one or more of our six solutions.

To maximise real-world impact, we aim to participate in at least 50% of new share issuances. This ensures our capital flows directly into companies to help scale their impact, rather than simply buying shares from existing shareholders - an approach that offers no added impact.

Our results so far: early steps, solution-aligned

Listed equity currently represents 2% of our total portfolio. All three companies we’ve invested in through this asset class contribute to one or more of our six key solutions—two are aligned with the bio-based solution, and one with the toxicity-free solution.

Although only two investments have so far been assessed using our BCS maturity scale, we are already seeing encouraging practices, such as:

  • Biodiversity screening through the WWF Risk Filter

  • Climate target setting and TCFD-aligned risk analysis

  • Social equality initiatives, including employee wellbeing programmes, value chain assessments, and supplier codes of conduct

These first investments lay the foundation for a more impact-driven listed equity strategy—one in which capital allocation actively supports sustainable business models and delivers tangible positive outcomes.

_dw15861-hdr

Accsys Technologies

Accsys Technologies remains a frontrunner in sustainable building materials through its flagship product: Accoya® wood. This modified wood offers...

Read more
jaqt7611

Aquaporin

Aquaporin’s mission is to ensure global access to clean drinking water by reimagining water filtration through biotechnology. The company promotes more sustainable water management by improving access...

Read more
about-1

Avantium

Avantium is creating innovations that move the chemical industry away from fossil-based feedstocks and accelerate the transition to a circular economy. The company firmly believes the future of plastics lies above ground...

Read more